The University of Alabama

 

FACULTY SENATE MEETING AGENDA

February 19, 2002

3:30pm—Ferguson Forum

Role Call and Quorum Check (Keith Woodbury)

Commendation Presentation

Question and Answer Remarks by President Sorensen and his Executive Staff (20minutes)

Remarks by Gene Marsh, Faculty Representative, and Marie Robbins, Athletics Department Compliance Officer

Approval/Corrections to the Minutes for January 22 (Keith Woodbury)

Action Items

Resolution Commending Marie Robbins and Gene Marsh (5 minutes)

Resolution proposing Fall Study Days (10 minutes)

Changes to the Senate Bylaws to define regular faculty who are eligible to serve in the Senate (10 minutes)

Discussion/feedback on the two ombudsperson proposals (10 minutes)

President’s Report (Norm Baldwin)

System of Faculty Feedback, Task Force on the Evaluation of Deans and Chairs

Information from the Provost and President

Student request to post faculty grades (not the student evaluations)

Harry Hopkin’s position/view

Nomination committee for new Senate Officers

New Library Annex

Volunteers to lobby

Feedback on on-line submission of grades (two to one positive; registrar will get rid of the second request for faculty passwords)

Vice President’s Report (Steve Miller)

Secretary’s Report (Keith Woodbury)

Reports from Senate Committees (5 minutes each)

Academic Affairs (Don Desmet and Beth Macauley)

Invitation of coaches to the Faculty Senate

Concerns over the grade security

NCAA investigation concerns (is there a denial of endemic problems?)

Inconsistent tenure and promotion standards between departments and colleges

Financial Affairs (Terry Royed and Keith Woodbury)

Intellectual Property Rights Joint Committee update

Health insurance for graduate students

Planning and Operations (Bill Keel and John Mason)

Scheduling Issues: Tuesday due date for final exam grades

ACHE data presentation (instructional/non-instructional split; TA data)

Environmental Audit—should we do one?

Faculty Life (Wythe Holt and Jerry Rosiek )

Domestic Partner Benefits update

Maternity leave policy for the Faculty Handbook

Picketing staff members

Diversity concerns of the English Department

Research and Service (Bing Blewitt)

Library fines and book replacement policy for faculty

Senate Operations (Steve Miller and Harry Price)

Senate Reapportionment, including double dipping concerns (needed before next election)

Grievance Document

Shared Governance: Interaction with the President’s Executive Staff; Dean’s representation (non-voting) on Steering Committee and Senate representation (non-voting) on Council of Deans; Graduate Student Association representation (i.e., non-voting, floor privileges) on the Faculty Senate; Implementation of "Shared Governance Document" principles

Student Affairs (Alvin Winters)

Reports from University Standing and Other Committees

Strategic Planning Initiative Task Force (Margaret Garner)

Legislative Agenda Task Force (Margaret Garner)

New Business

Old Business

Announcements

Our next monthly meeting with the Provost is February 28 at 3:00 in room 254 Rose

Higher Education Day in Montgomery is this Thursday, February 21st.


RESOLUTION COMMENDING MARIE A. ROBBINS AND GENE A. MARSH

 

Whereas, the quality of The University of Alabama's football program is a source of pride and pleasure for its students, alumni, and staff, and for the citizens of the State of Alabama, and

Whereas, recent findings of abuse of NCAA recruiting regulations and the publicity and penalties resulting from the NCAA's investigation of those claims have damaged the reputation of the University and the quality of the football program, and

Whereas, any allegation or penalty from the NCAA concerning academic fraud would be of serious concern to the faculty, and

Whereas, Compliance Director Marie Robbins's efforts were especially crucial in preventing further damage that could have resulted from the University's being dealt any allegation of, much less any penalty for, academic fraud possibly connected with the recent NCAA investigation, thanks to her quick and sure insight and hard work, and

Whereas, addressing the NCAA allegations has been a daunting task protracted over a two-year period, requiring hours of thorough investigation, careful preparation, cooperation with and negotiation with NCAA officials, and lengthy argument before that body, and

Whereas the scrupulous, fair, and excellent work of Marie Robbins and Faculty Athletic Representative Gene Marsh in their respective positions has kept the NCAA from being able to bring against the University the serious charges of lack of institutional control and

failure properly to monitor our athletic programs, and has prevented imposition of the most serious NCAA penalty, the "death penalty,"

Therefore be it resolved that the Faculty Senate of The University of Alabama expresses its deep appreciation to Marie Robbins and Gene Marsh for their tireless efforts, keen judgment, and unparalleled dedication to the University in the performance of their duties over the past two years.


 

Proposed Fall Study Days for Students
(Developed by the Faculty Senate
Planning and Operations Committee)

Whereas the Student Government Association (SGA) has proposed a two-day fall study days during early to mid-October, and

Whereas 71% of students voted in favor of a fall break during the 2001 homecoming elections, and

Whereas a 1997 study of admissions to the student health center showed peak admissions during the month of October, suggesting that students are becoming run down and losing their defenses around early to mid-October, and

Whereas six of the 12 SEC schools currently schedule a fall break (Vanderbilt, LSU, Tennessee, Georgia, Kentucky, and South Carolina), and

Whereas the University of Arkansas is investigating whether to implement a fall break, and

Whereas two of the SEC schools without a fall break have four days off at Thanksgiving (Auburn and Mississippi), and

Whereas students could profitably use the time-off during Fall Study Days to catch up on assignments and/or rest before for the second half of the semester commences, and

Whereas starting classes two days earlier in August (on Monday rather than Wednesday) could salvage the first week of classes, which now have spotty attendance because some students are of the opinion that not much happens during a class that meets only once during the first week (many students often view the first week of classes as syllabus week), and

Whereas starting classes two days earlier in August (on Monday rather than Wednesday) would ensure that two study days on a Monday and Tuesday in October would not cause classes that meet one day a week to lose a week of classes, and

Whereas faculty and staff would not have the study days off and, as such, Fall Study Days would not lead to an increased number of paid holidays, and

Whereas faculty and staff could use the study days to catch up on grading exams and papers, committee meetings, research, and various administrative tasks.

Therefore be it resolved that the Faculty Senate proposes a Monday-Tuesday Fall Study Days during early to mid-October, beginning with the Fall 2003 semester.


M E M O R A N D U M

To: J. Norman Baldwin, President, Faculty Senate

From: Senate Operations Committee: Members Holt, Miller, and Price

Re: Adding language to the Faculty Senate By-laws

 

The Steering Committee recommends the following additions and changes to the UA Faculty Senate By-laws:

Make Article II, Section 8 to be Section 9, and in its place insert the following new paragraph describing the term "regular" faculty member (also see below the text in italics inserted into Article II of our bylaws).

"FACULTY HOLDING REGULAR APPOINTMENTS

A faculty member holding a regular appointment is someone who is tenured, tenure earning, or a temporary full- or part-time instructor at The University of Alabama. Temporary full- or part-time instructors are individuals who have been teaching six hours or more per term on a continuing basis (three or more consecutive academic-year terms) who do not hold tenure or are tenure earning at another institution of higher education."


February 15, 2002

This proposal is submitted with the understanding that details not specified in this draft will be completed in committee when and if the Senate approves the basic structure outlined below.

Following is an outline of a procedure for the selection of University Ombudspersons:

1) Ombudspersons should be elected by the faculty in conjunction with Faculty Senate elections every year.

2) There should be three Ombudspersons.

3) The term of Office should be three years.

4) Terms should not be parallel so that one new Ombudsperson would be elected every year as each one in turn finishes his or her tenure.

5) Candidates should be as representative of the entire faculty as possible; therefore one Ombudsperson should come from A&S (379 full-time faculty), one from Business or Engineering (198 full-time faculty) and one from the other colleges and academic units (312 full-time faculty).

6) The total of three should include at least one female and one male Ombudsperson;

7) Candidates should have the following qualifications:

a) tenure

b) rank of associate or full professor

c) 10 years of service as a full-time faculty member with teaching and research responsibilities.

8) Candidates should not be:

a) members of the Faculty Senate;

b) members of the Grievance Committee;

c) current or former administrators.

9) Any faculty member should be free to seek the advice and help of any Ombudsperson, regardless of the academic unit of either of their appointments.

10) The three Ombudspersons would function as a nominating committee by identifying candidates for election each year. Every effort should be made to have multiple candidates and to rotate representation through the various departments and colleges over a period of time.

11) An initial election would identify three Ombudspersons for one, two, and three years respectively. Nominations, for that election only, should be made from the floor of the Faculty Senate after the university faculty have had sufficient time to review a well circulated announcement and identify candidates for their representatives.


Article I. Senate Officers

In all elections of Senate Officers-President, Vice President, and Secretary-elections will be by the vote of the majority of the senators voting, in a meeting at which a quorum of the Senate is present. Nominations and election of the Senate President will be completed before the floor is opened for nominations for Vice President, who will also serve as the faculty ombudsperson, and the election of the Vice President will be made before nominations are received for the Office of Secretary. Any senator interested in serving in one or more of these offices may submit a written statement of intention, with any supporting argument, not to exceed one page in length, to the Secretary of the Senate by March 14 of the year in which he or she hopes to commence office. The Secretary will distribute each such statement and supporting argument with the agenda for the March meeting of the Senate. Persons may also be nominated for these offices from the floor at the March meeting. A motion to close nominations, or the equivalent, is out of order. Each candidate will have an opportunity to speak to the Senate about his or her candidacy, and the Senate will have an opportunity to ask questions of each candidate.

 

Note: I’m skipping the first three sections of Article II on Senate orientation, steering committee, and standing committees in order to save space. The new language is in italics in section 9.

 

Article II. Organization

Section 4. Special Committees.

Special committees may be created by the Senate as needed. Unless the Senate directs otherwise, special committee members and chairpersons shall be designated by the same methods as for standing committees. Persons eligible to vote in Senate elections who are not members of the Senate may be appointed by special committees as their consultants.

Section 5. Subcommittees.

Standing and special committees may establish such standing or special subcommittees as they deem useful. Persons eligible to vote in Senate elections who are not members of the Senate may be appointed by subcommittees as their consultants.

Section 6. Parliamentarian.

The Senate President will nominate a parliamentarian, subject to Senate confirmation, to serve as recommended in the most recent revision of Robert's Rules of Order except where these Rules are contravened by a rule adopted by the Senate. This person will be a member of the Faculty, as defined in the Constitution, who is not a senator; or a member of the retired faculty. It shall be the duty of the Parliamentarian to attend all meetings of the Senate and of the Steering Committee.

Section 7. Webmaster.

The Senate President will nominate a webmaster, subject to Senate confirmation, to serve as the producer and coordinator of the Senate's web site. This person will be a member of the faculty, who may be but need not be a senator.

Section 8. Faculty Holding Regular Appointments

A faculty member holding a regular appointment is someone who is tenured, tenure earning, or a temporary full- or part-time instructor at The University of Alabama. Temporary full- or part-time instructors are individuals who teach six hours or more per term on a continuing basis (three or more consecutive academic-year terms) who do not hold tenure or are tenure earning at another institution of higher education.

Section 9. Offices.

The Senate shall maintain offices, in a room or rooms in the University assigned by the President of the University. The Senate offices shall be the location of the files of the Senate.

Section 10. Vice President.

The Vice President will serve as the faculty ombudsperson--an impartial and confidential resource to assist faculty in resolving problems, complaints, conflicts, or other issues. As the ombudsperson, he/she will assist faculty in finding just and timely resolutions to problems. In so doing, the Vice President will act as a neutral resource rather than taking sides on issues.